| ON NOVEMBER 3 I WILL SEND A LETTER TO WALMART CORPORATE THAT STATES MY INTENTION OF FILING A LAW SUIT AGAINST THE COMPANY FOR VARIOUS REASONS AND FOR VARIOUS REMEDIES. I WILL BE GOING TO THE LSU LAW LIBRARY IN ORDER TO FIND THE APPROPRIATE FORMAT TO FILE. THEN TO THE BATON ROUGE COURTS TO SEE IF I WILL HAVE TO PAY THE 195.00 FEE TO FILE OR IF THE JUDGE WILL ALLOW ME TO FILE IT WITHOUT THE FEE. I WILL UPDATE THIS SITE AS I GET MORE INFORMATION ON WHAT HAPPENS. I STOPPED ONCE BECAUSE I THOUGHT AN ATTORNEY MIGHT TAKE IT ALL ON BUT HAVE DECIDED TO GO AHEAD ON MY OWN. |
THIS IS A PAGE THAT WILL SHOW THE
PROGRESS OF THE LAWSUIT I AM FILING
AGAINST WAL-MART.
SERIOUSLY MOST ATTORNEYS WANT NO
PART OF IT BUT I DO NOT HAVE THE FUNDS
TO RETAIN AN ATTORNEY AND I AM SURE
NO ONE IS GOING TO TAKE ON MY SUIT PRO
BONO SO I MAY HAVE SOME SET BACKS
OCCASIONALLY BUT I WILL PROCEED WITH
IT AS I LEARN MORE ABOUT ARKANSAS LAW
AND THE PROCEDURES FOR FILING THIS
SUIT AND TAKING IT TO THE COURTS.
PROGRESS OF THE LAWSUIT I AM FILING
AGAINST WAL-MART.
SERIOUSLY MOST ATTORNEYS WANT NO
PART OF IT BUT I DO NOT HAVE THE FUNDS
TO RETAIN AN ATTORNEY AND I AM SURE
NO ONE IS GOING TO TAKE ON MY SUIT PRO
BONO SO I MAY HAVE SOME SET BACKS
OCCASIONALLY BUT I WILL PROCEED WITH
IT AS I LEARN MORE ABOUT ARKANSAS LAW
AND THE PROCEDURES FOR FILING THIS
SUIT AND TAKING IT TO THE COURTS.
I AM IN THE PROCESS OF FINDING OUT HOW
THE STATE OF ARKANSAS HANDLES THE FILING
OF LAW SUITS.
AS SOON AS I AM SURE I CAN, I INTEND TO FILE
MY OWN WITHOUT AN ATTORNEY.
WATCH FOR UPDATES HERE.
I AM ALSO LOOKING FOR THE LARGEST
STOCKHOLDERS TO EXPLAIN WHAT IS GOING
ON BEHIND THE SCENES.
THE STATE OF ARKANSAS HANDLES THE FILING
OF LAW SUITS.
AS SOON AS I AM SURE I CAN, I INTEND TO FILE
MY OWN WITHOUT AN ATTORNEY.
WATCH FOR UPDATES HERE.
I AM ALSO LOOKING FOR THE LARGEST
STOCKHOLDERS TO EXPLAIN WHAT IS GOING
ON BEHIND THE SCENES.
November 4, 2005
Julie Pierce
12719 E Millburn Ave
Baton Rouge, La 70815
November 4, 2005
225-273-4354
juliejpjersey@aol.com
To the Board of Directors and Walton Family,
I cannot afford an attorney so I am sending this to request a letter explaining Walmart’s position on
my separation from the company among other remedies as determined by previous communications
and situations arising from this action taken by Walmart on February 28, 2005.
I need an indication of exactly what is being said when a reference check is made.
Many contacts over a nine-month period have indicated to me, that there has been numerous
communications that have caused me to be in a situation where Walmart has destroyed my career in
retail.
Considering I requested an attorney be present if interrogations by district manager Janey and Loss
Prevention Supervisor Jason were to continue was told I could leave and left the premises in order
to find out if this could be avoided by contacting the home office. I reported to management that I
was leaving the store for a specific reason and continued to stay in direct contact with the store
manager until his call to me on February 28.
I consider leaving was directly connected to the situation where I was isolated in the manager’s
office with no witness present being put under pressure to respond to personal issues and
questioning that was considered by me to be hostile in nature.
My store manager on Feb 28 first said I should report to work March 2 after my day off then called
later that day and terminated me.
I never received a response from the home office and was told by the Gonzales Louisiana Store
manager that he was directed from higher up to terminate me.
I have documents that contradict each other. As far as my status with the company I have no real
answer.
I have other documentation all of which no one has had any interest in listening to or looking at and
will use any of it as needed to show that my intentions were nothing other than good at the time.
I did nothing wrong and although Louisiana along with other states has an at will employment law, I
see much more connected to this situation and a retaliatory kind of situation where Walmart
considered my private life and terminated me because of my moral beliefs at that time.
I consider the exit interview that was filled out by the store manager Mark and Co manager Richard
as defamatory and filled with lies. I was not present for this and did not sign it.
This letter is notification of my need to have answers. This is a final effort to obtain a written form of
reference and a determination of separation.
My inability to pay an attorney will decide my continuing efforts to be reimbursed for intentional
hardship placed on my career, character and family by Walmart due to the malicious and negative
comments made about my employment with the company.
If a response is not received within seven days of receipt of this correspondence I will proceed pro
se to file for any and all relief that will remedy my current situation as I believe Walmart has caused
all either directly or indirectly with malice.
Indication at the time of my hire was that an open door within the company exists and this open door
was not available to me for any questions I had at the time of the interrogations or at any date after.
Indication at the time of my hire was that if I followed company policy I would be gainfully employed
and not harassed by upper or equal management.
There area many variables and reasons for my questioning the situation including my inability to find
gainful employment with thirty years of retail experience.
Instances of misappropriation of funds and gender discrimination along with other ethics issues on
a local and corporate level that I presented to higher management in good faith were, I believe the
reason behind my ultimate separation.
Full disclosure is requested at this time.
Julie Pierce
Julie Pierce
12719 E Millburn Ave
Baton Rouge, La 70815
November 4, 2005
225-273-4354
juliejpjersey@aol.com
To the Board of Directors and Walton Family,
I cannot afford an attorney so I am sending this to request a letter explaining Walmart’s position on
my separation from the company among other remedies as determined by previous communications
and situations arising from this action taken by Walmart on February 28, 2005.
I need an indication of exactly what is being said when a reference check is made.
Many contacts over a nine-month period have indicated to me, that there has been numerous
communications that have caused me to be in a situation where Walmart has destroyed my career in
retail.
Considering I requested an attorney be present if interrogations by district manager Janey and Loss
Prevention Supervisor Jason were to continue was told I could leave and left the premises in order
to find out if this could be avoided by contacting the home office. I reported to management that I
was leaving the store for a specific reason and continued to stay in direct contact with the store
manager until his call to me on February 28.
I consider leaving was directly connected to the situation where I was isolated in the manager’s
office with no witness present being put under pressure to respond to personal issues and
questioning that was considered by me to be hostile in nature.
My store manager on Feb 28 first said I should report to work March 2 after my day off then called
later that day and terminated me.
I never received a response from the home office and was told by the Gonzales Louisiana Store
manager that he was directed from higher up to terminate me.
I have documents that contradict each other. As far as my status with the company I have no real
answer.
I have other documentation all of which no one has had any interest in listening to or looking at and
will use any of it as needed to show that my intentions were nothing other than good at the time.
I did nothing wrong and although Louisiana along with other states has an at will employment law, I
see much more connected to this situation and a retaliatory kind of situation where Walmart
considered my private life and terminated me because of my moral beliefs at that time.
I consider the exit interview that was filled out by the store manager Mark and Co manager Richard
as defamatory and filled with lies. I was not present for this and did not sign it.
This letter is notification of my need to have answers. This is a final effort to obtain a written form of
reference and a determination of separation.
My inability to pay an attorney will decide my continuing efforts to be reimbursed for intentional
hardship placed on my career, character and family by Walmart due to the malicious and negative
comments made about my employment with the company.
If a response is not received within seven days of receipt of this correspondence I will proceed pro
se to file for any and all relief that will remedy my current situation as I believe Walmart has caused
all either directly or indirectly with malice.
Indication at the time of my hire was that an open door within the company exists and this open door
was not available to me for any questions I had at the time of the interrogations or at any date after.
Indication at the time of my hire was that if I followed company policy I would be gainfully employed
and not harassed by upper or equal management.
There area many variables and reasons for my questioning the situation including my inability to find
gainful employment with thirty years of retail experience.
Instances of misappropriation of funds and gender discrimination along with other ethics issues on
a local and corporate level that I presented to higher management in good faith were, I believe the
reason behind my ultimate separation.
Full disclosure is requested at this time.
Julie Pierce
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
UPDATES ON THE LAWSUIT MY FILINGS, MY
WORKS...THE PROCESS HOWEVER
SLOW...INFORMATION ON ARKANSAS LAW...
WORKS...THE PROCESS HOWEVER
SLOW...INFORMATION ON ARKANSAS LAW...